Author: JunkMale
Date: 05-05-03 20:53
Dan Langille (via dial up) wrote:
> What has happened is the commits for both ports have been
> recorded against the japanese port. This is because of an
> error in the code used to obtain the port id given a port
> name and a category name.
This is incorrect. I was wrong. The commits are recorded against the correct ports. The database is correct. It is the website which is wrong. The code is question affects only the display of information.
The fix is not complex, but I don't think I'll have it ready until tomorrow.
> I will fix the code and rerun the commits so the correct
> results are stored in the FreshPorts database.
This doesn't have to be done. *phew*
> However, this doesn't resolve the issue at hand: how to
> display virtual ports.
Once I get this problem solved and implemented into the production website, we'll come back and look at the issues raised by your original post.
--
Dan Langille - webmaster
|
|