non port: print/hugelatex/Makefile |
Number of commits found: 16 |
Tuesday, 5 Feb 2013
|
15:07 bapt
Mark as deprecated a bunch of ports that are marked as broken for more than 6
month without a fix
|
Monday, 2 Apr 2012
|
10:20 bapt
Mark as broken: it overwrites files owned by one of its dependencies
pkgng says:
hugelatex-1.0_5 conflicts with teTeX-base-3.0_22 (installs files into the same
place). Problematic file: /usr/local/share/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf
Reported by: pointyhat (pkgng exp-run)
Feature safe: yes
|
Monday, 2 May 2011
|
12:44 makc
Bump PORTREVISION after open-mofit update
|
Sunday, 28 Mar 2010
|
06:47 dinoex
- update to 1.4.1
Reviewed by: exp8 run on pointyhat
Supported by: miwi
|
Friday, 5 Feb 2010
|
11:46 dinoex
- update to jpeg-8
|
Friday, 31 Jul 2009
|
13:57 dinoex
- bump all port that indirectly depends on libjpeg and have not yet been bumped
or updated
Requested by: edwin
|
Saturday, 19 May 2007
|
20:32 flz
- Welcome X.org 7.2 \o/.
- Set X11BASE to ${LOCALBASE} for recent ${OSVERSION}.
- Bump PORTREVISION for ports intalling files in ${X11BASE}.
|
Friday, 4 Nov 2005
|
00:55 edwin
In post-install, remove log files[*] generated during the installation phase.
[*] after discussions on irc about what the .fmt files are.
|
Monday, 19 Sep 2005
|
15:27 linimon
Reset maintainer at his request. From the email:
It is not clear to me if it is a needed port anyway, so I'd be skeptical
of patches that "fix it". It may be obviated completely by more recent
teTeX distributions.
|
Saturday, 23 Jul 2005
|
02:53 kris
This port is scheduled for deletion on 2005-09-22 if it is still broken
at that time and no PRs have been submitted to fix it.
|
Saturday, 26 Mar 2005
|
19:51 kris
BROKEN: Incomplete pkg-plist
Approved by: portmgr (self)
|
Thursday, 16 Oct 2003
|
21:59 linimon
Fix PLIST and unbreak. Note, however, Murray's email to me:
I'm not sure that my original goals for hugelatex even make sense any
more, and that the port is still needed. Does it properly work with
larger documents that the default won't work with? [If not,] the port
should simply be removed.
I don't know enough about LaTeX to know that answer to that one. Could
LaTeX users weigh in on this?
PR: ports/50094, ports/51837
Submitted by: Volker Stolz, Alex Dupre
Approved by: murray (maintainer)
|
Tuesday, 6 May 2003
|
07:16 kris
BROKEN: Bad pkg-plist
|
Friday, 7 Mar 2003
|
06:09 ade
Clear moonlight beckons.
Requiem mors pacem pkg-comment,
And be calm ports tree.
E Nomini Patri, E Fili, E Spiritu Sancti.
|
Tuesday, 29 Jan 2002
|
11:48 knu
Use ${ECHO_CMD} instead of ${ECHO} where you mean the echo command; the ECHO
macro is set to "echo" by default, but it is set to "true" if make(1) is
invoked with the -s option while ECHO_CMD is always set to the echo command.
|
Saturday, 8 Sep 2001
|
02:06 murray
Add hugelatex, a meta-port for teTeX that builds a version of latex with
higher default limits.
|
Number of commits found: 16 |