FreshPorts -- The Place For Ports If you buy from Amazon USA, please support us by using this link.
Follow us

We also have a status page:

Help with ports
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Log In   Previous Message  |  Next Message 
 Re: mod_fcgid unfairly described
Author: Dan 
Date:   23-11-05 12:44

AnonyBsd wrote:

> As you can see at, the
> maintainer was removed after the forum post.

True. I don't think the two events are related.

> I cannot submit a patch because I no longer have access to
> FreeBSD. I'm running Debian 3.1 until FreeBSD 6.x has most
> (not even all) of the ports I require on my servers.

FYI: if you disagree with the description, you don't need FreeBSD to submit a patch. Try the web interface:

> If you or another person with access to FreeBSD can take over
> as maintainer of mod_fcgid, it would be beneficial.

People take over maintainership when interested. I don't use the port. I'm not interested. :)

> mod_fcgid version in ports is outdated by over a year, and the
> project is gaining popularity due to people finally switching
> to Apache2 and also trying out Ruby-on-Rails since mod_fcgid is
> more stable than mod_fastcgi on Apache2 (at least on Linux with
> worker MPM).

All it takes is interest.

 Reply To This Message  |  Forum List  |  Flat View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 

 Topics Author  Date
 mod_fcgid unfairly described   new
AnonyBsd 27-10-05 04:44 
 Re: mod_fcgid unfairly described   new
Dan 13-11-05 13:31 
 Re: mod_fcgid unfairly described   new
AnonyBsd 23-11-05 04:18 
 Re: mod_fcgid unfairly described   new
Dan 23-11-05 12:44 

 Forum List  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Remember my login:
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.

Servers and bandwidth provided by
New York Internet, SuperNews, and RootBSD
Valid HTML, CSS, and RSS.
Copyright © 2000-2017 Dan Langille. All rights reserved.